Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Mirror Image Internet (2nd nomination)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk, contributions) 21:31, 21 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Mirror Image Internet[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Has been previously deleted for being insufficiently notable, and still is insufficiently notable. CoolieCoolster (talk) 12:49, 14 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Automated comment: This AfD was not correctly transcluded to the log (step 3). I have transcluded it to Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Log/2017 August 14. —^{cyberbot I}_{Talk to my owner:Online} 13:02, 14 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 14:12, 14 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Internet-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 14:12, 14 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy delete - clearly a company without any notability. Doesn't even attempt to establish any notability, and a google search fails to help. 1st result is company's site, 2nd is this wikipedia article. ‡ ᕮl Cid of ᐺalencia ^ᐐT₳LKᐬ 04:10, 15 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Article is completely inreferenced. Fails WP:GNG. Recommend WP:SALT to prevent recreation seeing as this is the 2nd AfD. -- HighKing⁺⁺ 19:26, 19 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.